[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Ngspice vs. Gnucap vs. ???

To: geda-user@seul.org
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Ngspice vs. Gnucap vs. ???
From: John Sheahan <jrsheahan@optushome.com.au>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:25:57 +1100
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:26:03 -0500
In-reply-to: <20030326153736.EBCC12AA07@earl-grey.cloud9.net>
References: <20030326153736.EBCC12AA07@earl-grey.cloud9.net>
Reply-to: geda-user@seul.org
Sender: owner-geda-user@seul.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 10:37:36AM -0500, Stuart Brorson wrote:
> Hi --
> 
> After playing around with gEDA and LTSpice, I tried running a SPICE
> netlist using ngspice.  Unfortunately, ngspice barfed saying "internal
> error -- segmentation violation".  The same netlist works like a champ
> with LTSpice.   
> 
> So that raises a question: is there any consensus amongst gEDA gurus
> which of the GPLed SPICE simulators is the better one?  Would anybody

I thought spice was bsd. have the others been rewritten or am I off base?

My experieces several years back comparing spice3f5 to ngspice 
modelling asic IO had spice3f5 way ahead of ngspice. (ie, it ran)
john

References:
- gEDA-user: Ngspice vs. Gnucap vs. ???
  - From: sdb@cloud9.net (Stuart Brorson)

Prev by Date: gEDA-user: Ngspice vs. Gnucap vs. ???
Next by Date: Re: gEDA-user: pcb problem
Previous by thread: gEDA-user: Ngspice vs. Gnucap vs. ???
Next by thread: gEDA-user: Switcap symbols and backend available.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread