[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: PCB: Stale rat's nest?
On Friday 03 March 2006 08:59, Dan McMahill wrote:
> I think what we need is early on in the documentation to have a quick
> and to the point definition of terms. Unfortunately, there is not an
> industry standard among cad tools so such a section (I'm thinking a page
> or less) would be a big help. For example, what we call a "footprint"
> in PCB is a "pattern" or a "stencil" in a couple of other tools.
I don't mean to push Eagle, but it too shows this sort of variance.
* Package: Generic collection of pads/holes and silk on the board - 8 pads
with 100 mil pad spacing and 300 mil row spacing, three pads in a triangle
pattern with 100 mil pad spacing and a tabbed circle around the group...
* Symbol: Generic collection of lines and pin connections - a box with 8
generic pins, a circle with three lines and an arrow...
* Device: Final mating of the two concepts, the actual unit used to populate
a schematic diagram and the associated board - DIL 555 timer, TO-18 2N2222
It's not such a big deal for me now that I know what a slot is and what refdes
means, but what about the next noob who tries to use gEDA?
Since there's at least one program that uses more common words, I think it
wouldn't be unreasonable to expect gEDA to eventually follow suit. A more
understandable interface means more users, and more users (ideally) means
more bug reports and feedback.
"Sometimes paranoia can be helpful. Usually it
isn't, and when you learn that, life improves."