Re: gEDA-user: footprints

["Phil Taylor" <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

One solution (for lack of user understanding, or confusion by gsh2pcb in its
parts selection) is to delete or rename the m4 libraries.

This is a foolproof approach when you'd rather only learn one type of
footprint.  It's made learning PCB a simpler proposition at times--in this way
it's been a helpful move for me.

Phil



DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> > Especially finding out the numeric arguments is funny. Of course the
> > developers will argue with you that it's actually easy, because they
> > know the source code by heart ;-)
> 
> *I* won't argue that the m4 libs are easy to figure out.
>