Thanks; very nice. However, I'm not sure that the numbers are right. The
figure shows that a 10nF//100nF pair gives a low impedance (< ~1 Ohm)
over a range of about 1.5MHz to 200MHz, which would make it ideal for
decoupling high speed parts. I compared this with an old Cypress HOTLink
app note where 22nF//100nF pairs were analysed, and the author's opinion
was that this wasn't suitable for high-speed decoupling, because of a
high resonant peak (~ 100 Ohm) at 150MHz. Your results show a peak of
about 0.4 Ohm (at 30MHz), so are much better.
The differences are:
1) The appnote assumes real parasitics of 5nH for a surface-mounted MLC
cap, compared to your manufacturer's figures of 1.6 - 1.9nH. Your
figures also seem to be for leaded caps: the SM figures are even lower.
2) The appnote gives a lower ESR of about 30 mOhm, while you're using
100 - 150 mOhm. The peak height varies inversely with the ESR.
Anyone have any other thoughts on real in-system ESL and ESR numbers?