[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: BatchPCB
It would be interesting to view this board using gerbv-2.0.X. The
latest gerbv includes some facilities for debugging low-level Gerber
problems under the "analysis" menu item (IIRC). gerbv also now has
some error reporting during the file parsing.
I looked at your posting on sparkfun. The Gerber looks OK, so I don't
think gerbv will complain. This is supported by the fact that other
checkers say your Gerbers are OK.
If I had to guess anything, I'd guess that *their* machine is choking
on %LNFRONT*% (can't handle standard but uncommon Gerber codes), and
then gets confused about what's a D and what's a G code.
As somebody on that list suggested, a work-around is to delete the
%LNFRONT*% and all other %LN lines from your Gerbers.
If the board house actually has live humans you can communicate with,
you can ask them if their machine supports the %LN<layer> code.
Cheers,
Stuart
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Jeff VR wrote:
> Hello,
> I wanted to drop a quick question to see if anyone here has had any trouble
> with their gerbers being interpreted correctly by batchpcb drc tool. My
> design looks just fine in viewmate and the protoexpress auto DRC passed the
> design.
>
> It seems the only room for error is in the batchpcb project submission page
> where it inquires about the software tool used for the design. I think this
> is for the drill file number format. I'm not really sure what I needed to
> put there so I tried a few different options. I opened the drill file and
> it looked like the format was "1.3 normal".
>
> My design didn't have a back silk screen layer so I created a simple one by
> hand but that didn't get around the issue either.
>
> This is what the log file generates from batchpcb's drc checker for both the
> top and bottom layers:
> Beginning GCODE run
> Invalid DCODE 0
> GCode execution failed!
>
> Here is the thread on the support forum for batchpcb:
> http://forum.sparkfun.com/viewtopic.php?p=44189#44189
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user