Re: gEDA-user: pcb: functions in hidnogui.c

[kai-martin knaak <kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Peter Clifton wrote:

> Having looked at it, I think it is pretty safe just to remove the CRASH
> statements in the hidnogui HID. (Both invalidate_lr and invalidate_all).
> 
> Alternatively, we would have to provide a NOP implementation of the two
> invalidate calls in each HID. I'd suggest (if this route is taken),
> making a new common helpers routine (perhaps rename drawhelpers.c), and
> provide NOP "common_invalidate_{lr,all}" functions which the non-GUI
> HIDs can all use.
> 
> I've pushed out some groundwork, removing various cruft such as the
> init_done flag (I think Ineiev had a similar patch), and removing the
> third, unused invalidate_wh method.

So, what does this mean for the actions-with-export-HID-patch?
Do I need to do some polishing? 


> As regards the printing.. I think it would be nice if the exporter HIDs
> took an explicit command-line parameter to determine which side of the
> board to export. The PNG exporter already does this for photo-mode.

Yes, the "bottomside" keyword in the layer stack string is not very user 
friendly. 

---<(kaimartin)>---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Ãffentlicher PGP-SchlÃssel:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user