[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: debugger for verilog
ballance@ballance.dhs.org said:
> Are you planning to support vpiDefLineNo and vpiDefFile soon? This
> functionality, obviously, is rather key for support of a symbolic
> debugger.
Well, it hadn't been high on my list for the obvious shear weight
of the data required to support for it. If including the information
were optional (and *not* default) then I'd be open to patches. Much
of what is needed is already carried in the netlist.h data structures,
they just need to be made available through the ivl_target.h API,
*and* through the vvp code generator.
--
Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep,
steve at picturel.com and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep."
abuse@xo.com
uce@ftc.gov