[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: What is the standard of gEDA tools and PCB
> I'd like to see another primitive trace type "arc" added to pcb for
> other than silkscreen use,
What's wrong with the arc it already has?
> but the code looks uneditable.... As a stop-gap measure, such
> outside tool generated curves could be a bunch of short segments in
> pcb
That's what I figured it would have to be.
> -- basically uneditable, yes, but if your tool also created a cell
> to place it in, at least it would be easy to delete and redo... I'm
> not sure if pcb as-is will use a "package placement" as a conductor
> though...
You mean, make it an element? That would be cool, but pcb might have
problems with such traces on inner layers. Also, I don't think pcb
supports copper in elements, just pads, pins, and silkscreen. IIRC I
tried to add copper to an RS232 connector pattern once, but had to
resort to pad/pin tricks.