[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Locking down auto-routed traces?

To: geda-user@seul.org
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Locking down auto-routed traces?
From: Bob Paddock <bpaddock@csonline.net>
Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 19:39:38 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 01 May 2004 19:40:25 -0400
In-reply-to: <20040501140037.GA20799@bondage.mcmahill.net>
Organization: The Designer-III Company http://www.designer-iii.com/
References: <200405010638.05347.bpaddock@csonline.net> <20040501140037.GA20799@bondage.mcmahill.net>
Reply-to: geda-user@seul.org
Sender: owner-geda-user@seul.org
User-agent: KMail/1.6.1

On Saturday 01 May 2004 10:00 am, Dan McMahill wrote:

> clear the autorouted trace flag on those traces.  Its bit 0x8.
> I can't seem to figure out how to do it without editing the
> .pcb file though.  There probably is a way though.
>
> in an example.pcb file  I have:
>         Line[105541 62022 114230 53333 600 600 0x00000080]
> making that be
>         Line[105541 62022 114230 53333 600 600 0x00000000]
> makes it not be an autorouted trace any more

I found you also have to clear the autorouted trace flag in the Via[] section 
as well.
 
-- 
                    http://www.softwaresafety.net/
       http://www.unusualresearch.com/ http://www.bpaddock.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: Locking down auto-routed traces?
  - From: Bob Paddock <bpaddock@csonline.net>

References:
- gEDA-user: Locking down auto-routed traces?
  - From: Bob Paddock <bpaddock@csonline.net>
- Re: gEDA-user: Locking down auto-routed traces?
  - From: Dan McMahill <dan@mcmahill.net>

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: DRC vs shorted nets?
Next by Author: gEDA-user: PCB .8mm 44TQFP/ATmega32?
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Locking down auto-routed traces?
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Locking down auto-routed traces?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread