[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: stupid divider

To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: stupid divider
From: Greg Cunningham <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 22:12:06 +1000
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 03 May 2008 08:12:20 -0400
In-reply-to: <481C087B.2090400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user>
List-help: <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-id: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user.moria.seul.org>
List-post: <mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <481C087B.2090400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I can remember a similar incident with 4xxx CMOS ff I was breadboarding
~20-odd years ago.  Sheer grief.  The CMOS edge driven clock would
generate errors if it wasn't clocked fast enough.  I was trying to clock
it with a passive r/c delay.  Not a chance. I put a schmidt buffer
between the passives & ck to fix it.  relevant? who knows... 
-- 
Greg 



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

References:
- gEDA-user: stupid divider
  - From: Dan McMahill

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: gschem: what's this debug message mean?
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Using 60Hz mains frequency for timing?
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: stupid divider
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: stupid divider
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread