Re: gEDA-user: pcb library and hid build modification

[Jason Childs <oblivian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:00 PM, DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Except that PCB is an application, not a library.  If swig assumes the
> target is a library (I don't think it does), perhaps that means that
> swig is a bad choice?  Or perhaps you could change the way you're
> trying to use it?  As soon as we split out a library, we have to start
> worrying about compatibility across releases, which is a pain.
>

You're right, swig does not assume the target is a library, but the
bindings would require all of the same object files that would be in a
shared library.  Which is why I'm suggesting a shared library.

Jason


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user