[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: PCB Patches: Use c99 bool instead of manual typedef.

To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: PCB Patches: Use c99 bool instead of manual typedef.
From: timecop <timecop@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 08:23:21 +0900
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 26 May 2010 19:23:38 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:x-goomoji-source:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=eNDcXeVrHd+Ps0Qx3XX67Y3GLYuK3jufn/I2A1p1+DU=; b=hs1xb3pHpNrds54Q8ZN4YcLTTG0j/bsOVVp6UpE/YieY6r967UouaJNzSRrbcpNSgd u14yVkwkQ7jbUafXH5VPLN2ZkA5bT41+lELD3PPAhYdG8xkZMl+OjEyIw8a7fvajE9Oo gJ8KHU1n8P0imZIQmGI2iur2OoCyz/eEWQEHY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:x-goomoji-source:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Ge7zGpWSBM9xQnlJibz3glEGO+q/BE9Eu2Li1Su2OJXvXyzOcfl8nwTxoNbxLx1tHF wNzawy7m4Hi8kyRShfMEghqb4pbvzRvzoQLZMEdkG+axHDv2vlIiuOgINZLF8eiOD7s1 my1HE/CUE6KUuBxg/YgCj7Ii86WnV7E1749Xw=
In-reply-to: <4BFDA105.1090501@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user>
List-help: <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-id: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user.moria.seul.org>
List-post: <mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1274912181.3534.18.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4BFDA105.1090501@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Anything not supporting c99 in 2010 shouldnt be used anyway.

On 5/27/10, Dave McGuire <mcguire@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 5/26/10 6:16 PM, Robert Spanton wrote:
>> I started working on stuff in the PCB source, and found that it uses a
>> typedef called 'Boolean' rather than the c99 bool type.  Please find
>> three patches that transition PCB over to using the c99 bool in the
>> following directory: http://srobo.org/~rspanton/geda/pcb-bools/
>>
>> The PCB build scripts tell the compiler to use the 'gnu99' standard (C99
>> with GNU extensions) so this shouldn't break anyone's build.
>
>    Does this have any implications for building with compilers other
> than GCC?
>
>                -Dave
>
> --
> Dave McGuire
> Port Charlotte, FL
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB Patches: Use c99 bool instead of manual typedef.
  - From: Dave McGuire
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB Patches: Use c99 bool instead of manual typedef.
  - From: Robert Spanton

References:
- gEDA-user: PCB Patches: Use c99 bool instead of manual typedef.
  - From: Robert Spanton
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB Patches: Use c99 bool instead of manual typedef.
  - From: Dave McGuire

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Protel
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: On Deprecation of GtkTearoffMenuItem
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: PCB Patches: Use c99 bool instead of manual typedef.
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: PCB Patches: Use c99 bool instead of manual typedef.
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread