[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: PCB Patches: Use c99 bool instead of manual typedef.




Nice attitude! Not surprising though...you seem to be as good at bad attitudes as I am, Mr. Timecop. And that's saying something.

The only "other" compiler I care about is a good bit more "modern" than GCC anyway, so I'm not too worried about it. While I do occasionally program my PDP-11s in C, I'm not particularly interested in trying to port PCB to that platform.

            -Dave

On 5/26/10 7:23 PM, timecop wrote:
Anything not supporting c99 in 2010 shouldnt be used anyway.

On 5/27/10, Dave McGuire<mcguire@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
On 5/26/10 6:16 PM, Robert Spanton wrote:
I started working on stuff in the PCB source, and found that it uses a
typedef called 'Boolean' rather than the c99 bool type.  Please find
three patches that transition PCB over to using the c99 bool in the
following directory: http://srobo.org/~rspanton/geda/pcb-bools/

The PCB build scripts tell the compiler to use the 'gnu99' standard (C99
with GNU extensions) so this shouldn't break anyone's build.

    Does this have any implications for building with compilers other
than GCC?


--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user