On 5/26/10 7:41 PM, Robert Spanton wrote:
Does this have any implications for building with compilers other than GCC?If they're not C99 compatible, yes. However, if this does actually come up as an issue then I suggest we conditionally enable the typedef using the autoconf AC_HEADER_STDBOOL macro and some cpp guff [1]. Is anyone actually compiling this thing with a compiler that isn't C99 compatible!?
Not to my knowledge...but I get really twitchy whenever anyone mentions "GCC extensions". ;) As long as things stay portable to non-GCC compilers (and note well that I'm NOT saying "ancient non-c99-compatible compilers") I'm happy.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user