I wrote: > I started working on stuff in the PCB source, and found that it uses a > typedef called 'Boolean' rather than the c99 bool type. Dave McGuire wrote: > Does this have any implications for building with compilers other > than GCC? If they're not C99 compatible, yes. However, if this does actually come up as an issue then I suggest we conditionally enable the typedef using the autoconf AC_HEADER_STDBOOL macro and some cpp guff [1]. Is anyone actually compiling this thing with a compiler that isn't C99 compatible!? timecop wrote: > Anything not supporting c99 in 2010 shouldnt be used anyway. Agreed! Rob [1] See this page: http://www.gnu.org/software/hello/manual/autoconf/Particular-Headers.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user