[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: An opportunity to fix the symbol library
Ales Hvezda wrote:
>> The symbols in the current default lib fail for both.
>
> Why don't you use gedasymbols.org to show us how you would fix the
> current gEDA/gaf shipped symbol library.
In a way, I already do ;-) See my section at gedasymbols.org.
Of course, the actual choice of components was guided by the
kind of projects I do. And I did not strive for completeness
beyond what I actually need.
> Create your ideal library,
IMHO, we all agree, that there is no such thing in a general sense.
No size fits all. That does not preclude improvement over the current
situation.
> no limits, or restrictions. Also, feel free to use as much disk space
> on gedasymbols.org (I have explicit permission from DJ) as you need.
Size wouldn't be an issue, anyway. In fact, I believe, the default libs
should be cut down to essentials -- Few instances, but excellent quality,
ready to use. Given the availability of gedasymbols.org, there is no point
to have several GND symbols and three kinds of BC247. Such a lib can act
as a starting point for first projects and for a localized set of libs.
> Let people know it exists, use it, and comment on it. Then, we can
> compare your symbol library to the broken shipped symbol library and
> see if it makes sense to switch.
I consider to bite...
---<)kaimartin(>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ãffentlicher PGP-SchlÃssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user