[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: What opensource spice to use?
- To: geda-user@seul.org
- Subject: Re: gEDA-user: What opensource spice to use?
- From: sdb@cloud9.net (Stuart Brorson)
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 17:03:59 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 17:04:20 -0500
- In-reply-to: <no.id> from "Bill Cox" at Nov 14, 2003 10:41:05 AM
- Reply-to: geda-user@seul.org
- Sender: owner-geda-user@seul.org
I've used both LTSpice & tclspice. LTSpice is undoubtedly the more
full featured of the two. However, it is closed source & runs on
Windoze. Not that that is a bad thing, it's just that my main
working platform is Linux. You can run LTSpice under wine just fine,
but it isn't native. I have never used 3rd party vendor models with
LTSpice, so I don't know how easy that is.
As for tclspice, I use it most of the time since I know it pretty
well. (After all, I have been contributing to the project. My latest
contribution was to integrate GNU readline into ngspice's CLI. The
old CLI was kinda crufty. . . . ) It does everything I want it to do,
and I particularly like the feature that you can write TCL scripts
to automate a SPICE simulation. I have used this to do complex
circuit optimization. Ya can't do that with LTSpice. OTOH, I can't
speak for the quality/modernity of the device models.
Good work on gnetman. I will try it out soon.
Stuart
>
> Hi.
>
> I've got a nice path working for me from gschem -> gnetman -> LTSpice.
> I'm pretty happy with LTSpice under wine, but TCL-Spice sounds pretty cool.
>
> Anyone out there had any luck with open-source SPICE?
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
>
>