[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: pcb SMT footprints

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: pcb SMT footprints
From: Wojciech Kazubski <wk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:57:28 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 03:57:42 -0500
In-reply-to: <437BF1A1.10104@mcmahill.net>
References: <20051116215356.GA22700@lrd5-64> <437BF1A1.10104@mcmahill.net>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.8.2

>...
> On my list of things to do is a big library cleanup.  In CVS, there are
> good footprints in ~geda for things like 0603 which follow the IPC
> naming conventions.  I suppose my next step should be to kill all of the
> others.
>
Are this names easy to learn?
My friend uses Cadstar to design PCBs. The program uses numeric designator for 
footprints, and he cannot do anything without a copybook containing package 
names, (or drawings) and translation to Cadstar numbers.

Wojciech Kazubski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: pcb SMT footprints
  - From: Dan McMahill

References:
- gEDA-user: pcb SMT footprints
  - From: Larry Doolittle
- Re: gEDA-user: pcb SMT footprints
  - From: Dan McMahill

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: EBC vs. 123
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: how to "add" newly created symbol
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: pcb SMT footprints
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: pcb SMT footprints
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread