[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: How to deal with single/dual parts?

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: How to deal with single/dual parts?
From: Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:23:35 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:08:13 -0500
List-archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user>
List-help: <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-id: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user.moria.seul.org>
List-post: <mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4B031BD9.40204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200911172210.nAHMAePW003097@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1258498379.30789.0.camel@pcjc2lap> <s6nk4xob5sj.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1258561022.3003.22.camel@pcjc2lap>
Reply-to: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black)

On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:17:02 +0000, Peter Clifton wrote:

> It is a perfect example of why gEDA can never grow more "friendly"
> interfaces to these problems. _Because_ the existing interface can be
> abused - and people think it is a good idea to encourage such
> "flexibility", we end up with designs out there relying on the
> behaviour.

Let me get this straight: Is the combination of a (slotted) symbol with a 
seperate power symbol such an abuse that just works by accident? 

---<(kaimartin)>---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: How to deal with single/dual parts?
  - From: Peter Clifton

References:
- gEDA-user: How to deal with single/dual parts?
  - From: Bill Gatliff
- Re: gEDA-user: How to deal with single/dual parts?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gEDA-user: How to deal with single/dual parts?
  - From: Peter Clifton
- Re: gEDA-user: How to deal with single/dual parts?
  - From: Stephan Boettcher
- Re: gEDA-user: How to deal with single/dual parts?
  - From: Peter Clifton

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: How to deal with single/dual parts?
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: How to deal with single/dual parts?
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: How to deal with single/dual parts?
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: How to deal with single/dual parts?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread