Re: gEDA-user: How to deal with single/dual parts?

[Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:18:39 +0000, Peter Clifton wrote:

> We could "probably" do with some additional annotations "somewhere"
> about exactly what pieces constitute a physical device - or sub-circuit,
> but that that would be an addition - rather than the abuse of an
> existing interface.

The two other EDA suites I worked (eagle and protel) with maintain the 
notion of a "component" that contains all the info. In a way, this is a 
very heavy symbol that knows about slots, possible footprints and which 
schematic symbols are necessary to represent a complete component.

---<(kaimartin)>---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user