Re: gEDA-user: How to deal with single/dual parts?

[msokolov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Sokolov)]

John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> A powerful component of an electronic design *automation* process.  
> Not the usual fritterware tool that forces you to tell it what to do,  
> repeatedly, by manual operation. Do graphics with GUI, do flow with  
> scripts. High productivity rather than cute a marketable.

John, why don't you just fork?  I've already made my own divergent-and-
forever-irreconciliable fork of gaf (uEDA/uschem) due to dissatisfaction
with the "fritterware" direction that gEDA/gaf is heading into, so why
can't you do the same?  This way you and I can have our totally
scriptable UNIX-style high-IQ-requiring toolbox while Peter C and crew
can have their "fritterware", and everyone will be happy with his choice.

That's what I like the most about Free / Open Source Software: the
ability to fork!  I have forked almost every program I use on a daily
basis because what I want is typically the opposite of what the rest of
the world wants.

MS


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user