[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
gEDA-user: device instead of value in PCB
- To: geda-user@seul.org
- Subject: gEDA-user: device instead of value in PCB
- From: Karel Kulhavy <clock@twibright.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:44:05 +0000
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 05:44:38 -0400
- Reply-to: geda-user@seul.org
- Sender: owner-geda-user@seul.org
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Hello
I tried to make an assembly plan using Screen->Value in PCB and then printing
out in PostScript and taking twister.pcb.output_assembly.ps
However my 74HC chips all have "unknown" printed there and it's impossible
to obtain the 74HC designation any way because it's not mentioned in
twister.pcb.
Would it be ideologically correct to patch the gschem2pcb tool to set the
value to device if no value is present?
Would it be ideologically correct to patch PCB that another assembly plan
say twister.pcb.output_assembly2.ps would be generated which would have
values instead of refdeses?
Cl<