Bob Paddock wrote:
Probably not so simple. Especially if you use the word "optimal" in a literal sense. I think you end up with a combinatorial search space. OTOH, sub-optimal but "better" could probably be achieved with a simple-minded greedy algorithm.What I always wonder about with these tools, or similar X/Y machines is why no one ever optimizes the travel to save time. Seems like it should be simple mater of sorting the vectors? Instead the machine goes at random from place to place.
-dave
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user