[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: PCB paste layer, revisited.
> Imagine, that you have a 431 pin BGA. Would you include 431 times
> the same padstack in the footprint? I think one should bother with
> the whatever shape, and size of the stencil, copper, mask, paste
> layers. Those are just "pads". Then we could link pads to a
> padstack, and the padstacks into the footprint.
For sanity's sake, let's let a footprint define its pad stacks for its
own pads, rather than trying to maintain a global cache of padstacks.
Then, a BGA footprint would have one "here's what my pads look like"
and 431 copies of "put one here".
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
- References:
- gEDA-user: PCB paste layer, revisited.
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB paste layer, revisited.
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB paste layer, revisited.
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB paste layer, revisited.
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB paste layer, revisited.
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB paste layer, revisited.
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB paste layer, revisited.
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB paste layer, revisited.
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB paste layer, revisited.
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB paste layer, revisited.