On 10/06/2010 08:47 AM, Steven Michalske wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:17 PM, John Griessen<john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I'm looking at using libopenstm32 for ARM chips, and wonder what GPLv3 does about your ability to sell a system with code in it. Can you sell it without a complete tool chain?
What would I need to do to comply with GPLv3 for a library delivered as part of a open hardware system? I'm thinking to just include the copyright notice and the library code only might be enough. I wouldn't need to have a repository for the whole tool chain used to build with the library. Correct? John G -- Ecosensory Austin TX _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user