[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Linear voltregs: Symbol bugs or features?
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 08:06:13PM -0400, Dan McMahill wrote:
>
> Lets not even talk about ECL parts where VCC is 0 volts and VEE is -5.2
> volts. "Hey, how come all the 10H116's on my board are smokin' hot?"
>
> Also, mixed supply designs are common. If you make a 3.3V logic part
> with implicit "VDD" power and you also have some 1.8V logic which also
> uses implicit "VDD", you've got problems in the form of a magic smoke leak.
>
> Implicit power connections are evil! The only place were I don't think
> so is DJ's example of the actual ground symbol or an actual VDD symbol.
> But there, you're paying attention.
>
> -Dan
>
My single board computer has 1.2V, 1.8V, 2.5V, 3.3V, 5.0V and 12V. The
DSPcard is better with "just" 1.2V, 2.5V and 3.3V. Implicit power
connections are something I have never used due to multiple supplies.
I have recently switched to using seperate power symbols for some large
components due to high power and ground pin counts (Spartan 3 FT256 has
28 ground balls and 40 power balls with 3 supply voltages). This works
well for me and I may even extend it to smaller parts in future designs.
--
Darrell Harmon
http://dlharmon.com/dspcard
Credit card size DSP/FPGA board