[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Functional blocks and PCB format changes
On 09/13/2010 09:57 PM, Ouabache Designworks wrote:
pin:
pinNumber: 2
pinName: "rst"
x1: 1234
y1: 4321
x2: 2345
y2: 4321
layer: component
or
<pin><pinNumber>2</pinNumber><pinName>"rst"<\pinName><x1>1234<\x1><y
1>4321<\y1><x2>2345<\x2><y2>5432<\y2><layer>component<\layer><\pin>
I call the second large, bloat, and ugly.
I would prefer
rectangle:
type: pin
pinNumber: 2
pinName: "rst"
x1: 1234
y2: 4321
x2: 2345
y2: 4321
layer: component
or
<rectangle, ID = 92135>
<type>pin
<pinNumber> 2<\pinNumber>
<pinName> rst<pinName>
<\type>
<basepos> ref92134<\basepos>
<loc, ID = 12359>
<x> 1234<\x>
<y> 4321<\y>
<\loc, ID = 12360>
<loc, type = rel>
<x> 1111<\x>
<y> 0<\y>
<\loc>
<\rectangle>
I'm not exactly sure how the referenced position will work out in XML or the first format (yaml?). Time for me to leave the house - so I'm not sure how correct any of this is.
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user