[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Functional blocks and PCB format changes



On 09/13/2010 09:57 PM, Ouabache Designworks wrote:
      pin:
       pinNumber: 2
       pinName: "rst"
       x1: 1234
       y1: 4321
       x2: 2345
       y2: 4321
       layer: component
      or
      <pin><pinNumber>2</pinNumber><pinName>"rst"<\pinName><x1>1234<\x1><y
      1>4321<\y1><x2>2345<\x2><y2>5432<\y2><layer>component<\layer><\pin>
      I call the second large, bloat, and ugly.
I would prefer

rectangle:
	type: pin
		pinNumber: 2
		pinName: "rst"
	x1: 1234
	y2: 4321
	x2: 2345
	y2: 4321
	layer: component

or

<rectangle, ID = 92135>
	<type>pin
		<pinNumber>  2<\pinNumber>
		<pinName>  rst<pinName>
	<\type>
	<basepos>  ref92134<\basepos>
	<loc, ID = 12359>
  		<x>  1234<\x>
		<y>  4321<\y>
	<\loc, ID = 12360>
	<loc, type = rel>
		<x>  1111<\x>
		<y>  0<\y>
	<\loc>
<\rectangle>
		
I'm not exactly sure how the referenced position will work out in XML or the first format (yaml?).  Time for me to leave the house - so I'm not sure how correct any of this is.




_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user