[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 02:57:31PM -0400, Windell H. Oskay wrote:
> >
> > I like "canvas" - it's a more popular idiom than cel.
>
> Indeed it is.
>
> My concern about "canvas" is that it does not convey a relationship to our
> physical layers. In some cases it would be reasonable to expect a "canvas"
> to refer a full layer or even to a stack of layers. IMHO, it would be
> beneficial if the term chosen connotates "sublayer" rather than layer or
> stack of layers.
>
> Another couple of suggestions:
>
> - Sublayer
> It's straightforward
>
There are some cases where it doesn't quite make sense - you could have
a sublayer mapped to two layers, for example. Plus it sounds too close to
"layer" and might be confusing in conversation.
> - Sheet
> A common metaphor in engineering-- it would make sense if there were
> multiple sheets to specify the details of each physical layer.
> Anti-copper sheet, digital keep-out sheet, anti-mask sheet, etc. This
> name would lend itself naturally to printed documentation for a project.
>
I really like this.
Andrew
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user