Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0

[Andrew Poelstra <asp11@xxxxxx>]

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 06:16:47PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > So drills, stacking order and physical layer geometry will be defined
> > in terms of composites, and drawing layers will be tagged to physical
> > layers?
> > 
> > Do we need a concept of "layer groups" in this setup?
> 
> In that example, the layer groups would be implied - drawing layers[*]
> mapped to the same physical layer are grouped.
>

Sounds good.
 
> [*] We need a better term for drawing layers, since "layer" means
> something specific in PCB design.  Or another name for physical
> layers.  Or something ;-)
>

How about "overlay"?


Andrew
 


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user