[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 04:29:07PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > > In our previous example, you'd get (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...)
> >
> > Okay, but where does that leave us in terms of having multiple drawing
> > layers on the same physical surface?
>
> (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...)
>
What's the physical meaning of an eight-layered composite?
The way you described composites, it sounds like it only has two sides.
So wouldn't a better default be:
(((12) (34)) ((56) (78)))
?
Andrew
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user