[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Another pcb segfault



On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 21:46 +0200, Ivan Stankovic wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:25:54PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Also, please file all bug reports in launchpad:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb
> 
> Right.
> This bug is now tracked at https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/850311.

Should be fixed now. Note that it appears to have been an assertion
failure, not a segfault. I don't know exactly why that occurred, but
with the fixed view-fit code, we no longer produce bad coordinates which
upset PCB.

Btw - PCB runs faster with asserts disabled - and that is the default
state. Did you have any extra patches or configure options in place to
get the asserts to be active?

(I'm betting the fact that DJ and I didn't see the assert fail is only
due to the fact that we're using the default build settings).

Regards,

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user