[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: egcs and gcc-c++
All I can offer to this conversation is that egcs programs have compiled
smoothly on my rh5.1 box - but they are about three times the size of the
original program. I'm sure that has something to do with the object
support... but then again, I'm not a programmer either.
Tim Lyons <email@example.com>
Project Independence Mirror:
On Sat, 15 Aug 1998, Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
> While I was playing with building some of the bleeding edge KDE
> components, I discovered that some of them require egcs to build.
> Question: should we consider moving to egcs *for C++ apps* ?
> Since I know precious little about compilers, I'll put the question to the
> experts ...
> Roberto, any ideas ? is egcs conspicuously better as a C++ compiler ?
> And how usable are the koffice components at this stage on linux ?
> The thing is that if we build this, we need to switch to egcs AFAIK. It's
> probably not worth switching just for this, but if there are further
> benefits of switching, then it might be a good move.
> Donovan Rebbechi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Web designer for Independence -- Linux for the Masses