[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Quantifying the benefits of kernel recompiling
> I think we must dispel the myth about "thou hast to recompile
> your kernel". Even a book like "Linux for dummies" bows to it.
> This plays into enemy's hands.
But Linux is not for Domies :) ... Well not yet, :)
> Official doctrine should be: "if you have above 16 Megs don't
Makes sense. After all our target audience will get 64 Megs
just to run StarOffice anyway.
> Also instead of telling people to learn how to recompile a
> kernel we should tell it is to the guy of the distribution to
> leazrn this.
A few notes on Distributions and Kernels. Slackware offers at
the end of install to choose what Kernel you will be installing
( There are several on the CD ). RedHat dose not.
However with the advent of 2.2.0 and the Likelihood that
SMP Machines will be finally affordable to normal people ( At
a Local shop the SMP P2 Motherboard was only 15% above the
single chip board ). In that world ( Perhaps by christmas )
it will be worthwhile to add an extra question to our setup
or to improve the default Lilo.
I like the Later option. The SlackWare LILO displays a prompt
with the different options ( often just dos and Linux ) without
the user needing to know he must press tab to see them.
How about adding a 3rd option to the default for SMP. Although
this becomes kinda pointless when IIRC you need to chose how
many chips at compile time.