[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Should we search for patronizing of the FSF?

To: independence-l@independence.seul.org
Subject: Re: Should we search for patronizing of the FSF?
From: Donovan Rebbechi <elflord@pegasus.rutgers.edu>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 04:55:18 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <199909081953.VAA00919@agnes.faerie.monroyaume>
Reply-To: independence-l@independence.seul.org
Sender: owner-independence-l@independence.seul.org

On Wed, 8 Sep 1999, JF Martinez wrote:

> On the other hand our field is one where we cannot afford to be strict
> because free software has traditionally been weak at software for non
> hackers.  And FSF alliance can be a diifficult one to handle.

I don't think they'll like us (-; They'll see us as too "commercial". I
don't like the chances of this being succesful ( and I'm not that
comfortable with the idea anway )

--
Donovan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should we search for patronizing of the FSF?
  - From: "Edmund Lively" <IDMONNNN@email.msn.com>
- Re: Should we search for patronizing of the FSF?
  - From: "Edmund Lively" <IDMONNNN@email.msn.com>
- Re: Should we search for patronizing of the FSF?
  - From: Birger Langkjer <birger.langkjer@image.dk>

References:
- Should we search for patronizing of the FSF?
  - From: JF Martinez <jfm2@club-internet.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: Should we search for patronizing of the FSF?
Next by Date: Re: Should we search for patronizing of the FSF?
Prev by thread: Re: Should we search for patronizing of the FSF?
Next by thread: Re: Should we search for patronizing of the FSF?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread