[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [kidsgames] Information source.
Hello,
On 1 Oct 1999 aleris@iag.net wrote:
> Quoting Jeffery Douglas Waddell <jeff@smluc.org>:
>
> > On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Doug Loss wrote:
> > > > Chris Ellec wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > From: aleris@iag.net
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In that spirit I guess I have a non-technical question. What do we
> > want to use
> > > > > > as authoritative sources of information?
> > >
> > > This URL is pretty authoritative
> > >
> > > http://www.britannica.com/
> > >
> >
> > Yes, but do we have any rights to the content. As far as I know it's
> > copyrighted in ways that make it unuseable for our purposes. I would
> > really LOVE to be proven wrong about that.
>
> I think the question is more about what we could agree on as a quality
> source of fact rather than something to directly quote from.
Hopefully OUR database ;)
> I don't
> think copyright is an issue here unless we start posting tracts of quotes
> from Britannica.
>
I thought that was what you were suggesting.
> Quoting from Britannica is probably a bad idea in any case.
Agreed on many levels.
> A lot of
> Britannica has a Western cultural bias.
Sure.
> This was part of what I was
> asking about. Particularly in history subjects, I think we need to be
> careful about discerning cultural bias from fact and evidence.
Well that is a scientific via of history and I tend to have that type of
view, I doubt that all historians via it that way.
> We don't
> want to end up creating a system "geared" towards any particular culture.
>
This will happen regardless of what we do, therefore we want, I think, to
make tools that are capable of making that bias clear to the user.
Instead of saying the application/content has no bais let's just state
what the bias is, perhaps another field in the database for this?
> Example: Christopher Columbus. We all learned in grade school about how
> he discovered the New World. There is currently a trend in the U.S. to
> paint Columbus as an invading marauder against native Americans. This is
> the kind of thing we need to avoid, this sort of cultural bias. Fact is,
> Columbus went to his deathbed convinced that he had found the Indies rather
> than a new continent. Amerigo Vespucci was a lot more responsible for
> the "discovery" of the New World than Columbus.
>
How do you present historical facts which are recorded from the point of
view of those that DID the recording without it being biased.... I don't
think that we need to, we just need to provide the mechanism by which the
bias can be taken into account.
> http://marauder.millersv.edu/~columbus/papers/butch-1.html
>
>
> Just some thoughts.
>
:) Thanks for sharing.....
> Rob
Jeff Waddell
jeff@smluc.org
-
kidgames@smluc.org -- To get off this list send "unsubscribe" in the
body of a message to majordomo@smluc.org