Re: [Libevent-users] PATCH: bufferevent_openssl consider_read doesn't drain underlying BE in all cases

[Mark Ellzey <mthomas@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 01:33:28PM +0500, Haseeb Abdul Qadir wrote:
> What you guys mean when you say 'build correct infrastructure'? Does it mean the ability to schedule callbacks and guarantee that callbacks will called in the order they've been queued? For example a timer callback with a timeout of 0 is usually enough to enough to defer processing to the next iteration of the event loop on other platforms (i.e Windows' message loop and Cocoa runloops).
> 

This is off-topic of this thread. But if you put events in a deferred
state, things are inserted in a tailq, so technically they will be
ordered.
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe libevent-users    in the body.