Re: [Libevent-users] std::threads

[Michael <tieyingz@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Tomer,

Yes. I am using c++11 std::thread.

On 03/17/2016 01:14 PM, Tomer Heber wrote:
> Hi Azat,
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong.
> But he is using std c++11 "libraries" which are cross platform.
> On the other hand, pthread is not cross platform.
>
> So I think Michael shouldn't use pthreads and instead implement the callbacks (which is actually pretty straightforward).
>
> 10x,
> Tomer.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-libevent-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-libevent-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Azat Khuzhin
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 1:54 AM
> To: libevent-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: libevent-users@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Libevent-users] std::threads
>
> > > It's better to enable locking for bufferevents anyway.
> > Are you sure it is ok to lock the bufferevents by our own lock? No
> > need to implement these
> > (http://www.wangafu.net/~nickm/libevent-book/Ref1_libsetup.html
> > <http://www.wangafu.net/%7Enickm/libevent-book/Ref1_libsetup.html>
> > specifically that section about âLocks and threadingâ)???
> >
> > How about event_base? lock event_base similar to bufferevents?
> I think that basic bufferevents locks must be enough (pthread on linux/some stuff on win32), since std::thread is not about this, IOW it is safe to synchronize via pthread's locks between them.
> ***********************************************************************
> To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> unsubscribe libevent-users    in the body.
> NïïïïïrïïzÇuïÞïïïïïïïÝjïïjïïïïpïïnïËïïïmïbmïÞÛzï"ïï^nïr

***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe libevent-users    in the body.