[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Foot Ball Game
> > Actually I'd like to hear some people's opinions on GGI. I've heard many
> > mixed things about it. From what I understand, kernel developers don't
> > like it and it will never be officially part of the kernel.
> I heard something brief (I forget where) about graphics being integrated
> into the kernel. Do you have a source for this? I'm just curious...
Maybe I could ask Alan Cox directly, but some of the folks here sort of
mentioned that the GGI stuff wouldn't be integrated b/c of the way it's
written or something like that. I'l try to get more specifics.
> > It seems that the folks that believe this think Mesa should be used
> > instead.
> Alright. Maybe I've got this wrong, but aren't GGI and Mesa totally
> different? I mean, GGI (simply stated) is a means of actually displaying
> graphics, right? And Mesa is a 3D library that requires something else
> (like X or Glide or GGI or SVGAlib) to actually put the 2D projection of a
> 3D image on the screen, right? Am I way off here?
Well yes your right.. ack.. I don't know what I was writing there. You
can write apps directly using the GGI interface similar to using the
I'll try to get what the main beef was about GGI.