[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interesting automake bug
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 06:22:57PM +0200, Jan Ekholm wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Chris Purnell wrote:
> >This is the implicit make rule again. Just as before with your header
> >files. Make has an implicit rule to make an executable out of a c++
> >source file as well as one to make a ".o" object file.
> I really don't get it. If I have something like this:
> ## programs
> bin_PROGRAMS = panzers
> panzers_SOURCES = blast.cpp \
> camera_manipulator.cpp \
> Why would it determine that "connection" is an application? Each of those
> files does have a corresponding .hh file, but they're not even mentioned
> anywhere. Why should their mere existence throw automake out in the
> dark goblin woods?
The building of "connection" was from before you renamed the header file
from "connection" to "connection.hh". The header files are mentioned
in the #include lines in the .cpp files.
But that is all fixed now. The remaining problem is the building of
"setup". Havining a look at your Makefile.am in CVS I see that you
have "setup" with no suffix in panzers_SOURCES.
Christopher John Purnell | I thought I'd found a reason to live
http://www.lost.org.uk/ | Just like before when I was a child
--------------------------| Only to find that dreams made of sand
What gods do you pray to? | Would just fall apart and slip through my hands