[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: non-SMTP uses (was: Thoughts on MixMinion archives)

To: mixminion-dev@freehaven.NET
Subject: Re: non-SMTP uses (was: Thoughts on MixMinion archives)
From: Zooko <zooko@zooko.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:54:41 -0700
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: mixminion-dev-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-To: mixminion-dev@seul.org
Delivery-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:58:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: Message from Len Sassaman <rabbi@quickie.net> of "Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:49:44 PDT." <Pine.LNX.4.30.QNWS.0204231443320.8291-100000@thetis.deor.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.QNWS.0204231443320.8291-100000@thetis.deor.org>
Reply-To: mixminion-dev@freehaven.net
Sender: owner-mixminion-dev@freehaven.net


Len:

> Regarding the license: again, it's not my business what license MixMinion
> is released under. I am strongly against the GPL, and I think the AGPL is
> even worse -- but that's why I'll be releasing Mixmaster 4.0 under a less
> restrictive license. :)

How do you feel about LGPL?

This reminds me that I have been starting to prefer MPL (with GPL-acceptance 
clause, or dual- or triple- licensed) over LGPL because some people find it 
more acceptable and because its scope is per-file rather than per-"Work".

Regards,

Zooko

Follow-Ups:
- Re: non-SMTP uses (was: Thoughts on MixMinion archives)
  - From: Len Sassaman <rabbi@quickie.net>

References:
- Re: non-SMTP uses (was: Thoughts on MixMinion archives)
  - From: Len Sassaman <rabbi@quickie.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Licensing and the client/server divide [was Re: License for mixminion dist]
Next by Date: Re: Thoughts on MixMinion archives
Prev by thread: Re: non-SMTP uses (was: Thoughts on MixMinion archives)
Next by thread: Re: non-SMTP uses (was: Thoughts on MixMinion archives)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread