[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Basic questions

To: Nick Mathewson <nickm@freehaven.net>, or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Re: Basic questions
From: Hee So <hee@____>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:12:48 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:13:10 -0400
In-reply-to: <20040826224012.GP12087@totoro.wangafu.net>; from nickm@freehaven.net on Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 06:40:12PM -0400
References: <20040826002048.A25753@dell103.hee.net> <20040826224012.GP12087@totoro.wangafu.net>
Reply-to: or-talk@freehaven.net
Sender: owner-or-talk@freehaven.net
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 06:40:12PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> I know there's at least one Windows solution that acts a little like
> tsocks, but I haven't used any myself.  SocksCap looks as though it
> might do what you want, but I'm not sure it's the very best.

I gave SocksCap a try and works pretty well. When the target
host was on the same subnet as the machine running Tor, Tor
complained that it didn't know how to get to the destination.
I was also told that Hummingbird works real well too. 
/hee

-- 
Hee So, GCIA #0489
Intrusion Analyst
 - Information and Privacy Protection, Security, and Investigations -

References:
- Basic questions
  - From: Hee So <hee@____>
- Re: Basic questions
  - From: Nick Mathewson <nickm@freehaven.net>

Prev by Author: Basic questions
Next by Author: Re: (FWD) Compiling Tor on Windows?
Previous by thread: Re: Basic questions
Next by thread: Test: TOR and the Mule --- HELP
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread