[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Torpark 220.127.116.11 Pre-release
Will it incorporate as an sfx archive?
Friday, August 4, 2006, 9:27:45 PM, you wrote:
> You might try UPX to see how it compares to 7zip compression. I find it's almost always better.
> From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UPX
> "... as UPX is specifically designed to compress executable code
> it often achieves better compression ratio than standard data
> compression facilities such as gzip, zip or bzip2. "
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Arrakistor <arrakistor@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Anothony Georgeo <or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2006 12:06:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Torpark 18.104.22.168 Pre-release
> I used 7zip, which compressed the 24MB down to about 7MB
> Right now I am using Adblock with the Filterset.G updater.
> Thursday, August 3, 2006, 8:26:02 PM, you wrote:
>> Hi Arrakistor,
>> --- Arrakistor <arrakistor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I am ready with the release of Torpark 22.214.171.124 (7MB)
>>> - Decompressed size of 24MB for USB friendly
>>> footprint (reduced from 40MB)
>> Did you use UPX v.2.0.1? This version offers better
>> .exe compression and better Win32 compatability.
>> I use the "--best" switch as "--brute" takes a *long*
>> time to process and I haven't seen better compression
>> ratios vs. "--best".
>>> - Adblock using Filterset.G Updater
>> Do you use Adblock or Adblock Plus? IMO ABP is
>> supirior to AB.
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around