[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: running a new node

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: running a new node
From: "Marco Bonetti" <marco.bonetti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 08:54:12 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:54:40 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <1218135850.4679.21.camel@mooncruiser>
References: <1218135850.4679.21.camel@mooncruiser>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6

On Thu, August 7, 2008 21:04, Austin wrote:
> Hello,  I started running a tor bridged relay a few days ago.
If you set up as a bridge instead of a standard middleman only, I think
it's ok: users have to known of you existence via the usual bridge request
method as you don't appear in the node lists.

You've a pretty good bandwith, if you are concerned about not using it try
to switch to middleman (or to exit) and do directory information mirroring
too.

And thanks for adding a new node :)

-- 
Marco Bonetti
Slackintosh Linux Project Developer: http://workaround.ch/
Linux-live for powerpc: http://workaround.ch/pub/rsync/mb/linux-live/
My webstuff: http://sidbox.homelinux.org/

My GnuPG key id: 0x86A91047

References:
- running a new node
  - From: Austin

Prev by Author: Re: Paid performance-tor option?
Next by Author: Re: Is it possible to establish a Keep-Alive connection ?
Previous by thread: Re: running a new node
Next by thread: Letter to the german SPIEGEL
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread