[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: blutmagie TNS / v0.2.2.15 nodes

Am 25.08.2010 12:35, schrieb Karsten Loesing:
> On 8/25/10 12:10 PM, Olaf Selke wrote:
>> blutmagie Tor network status site apparently displays incorrect
>> bandwidth values for all nodes running version Unlike other
>> tns sites blutmagie calculated bw as an average from the extra-info data
>> instead of using the bw peak value.


> This might be related to:
> Changes in version - 2010-08-18
>     - Relays report the number of bytes spent on answering directory
>       requests in extra-info descriptors similar to {read,write}-history.
>       Implements enhancement 1790.
> There are now two new lines "dirreq-read-history ..." and
> "dirreq-write-history ..." containing the bytes spent on the dir
> protocol. Maybe TNS greps for "read-history" and not "^read-history"
> when parsing descriptors?

yes exactly!

And cause the dirreq-history data lines are displayed behind the
ordinary read/write history data, the script summed up the dirreq
bandwidth. Thus blutmagie tns mistakenly displayed the (correct)
directory request bandwidth for all nodes. This is fixed now.

regards Olaf
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/