[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: storage privacy (was: Nice quiet, private, anonymous life??)
I guess you can read one persons attack but are blind to others (friend
of yours maybe?)
And I thought the people on this list were against censorship, unless
they, of course, are doing the censoring.
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:30:04 -0500, phobos@xxxxxxxxxx said:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 05:05:27PM -0700, mark485anderson@xxxxxx wrote
> 2.6K bytes in 66 lines about:
> : Hey Eugene, go fuck yourself ok? Have you actually tested using a
> : magnetic field for this, no.
> : Seems to me you're the one talking out of dev/ass, cuz you are one. And
> : don't put it past someone to wire a plastique device to the hard drive,
> : seems like a perfect solution for some terrorist, maybe a distant
> cousin
> : of yours?
>
> mark485anderson, This is unacceptable. Personal attacks on other people
> on list are entirely immature and off-topic. This post is worthy of a
> yellow card, if not red (in football parlance).
>
> Google returns many fine links about email etiquette on mailing lists.
> One such example is
> http://www.gweep.ca/~edmonds/usenet/ml-etiquette.html. In particular,
> the question "I've been insulted! How should I respond?" may pertain
> here.
>
> Let's assume this is a rare outburst and won't happen again. Thanks!
>
> --
> Andrew
--
mark485anderson@xxxxxx
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and
love email again
- References:
- Re: storage privacy (was: Nice quiet, private, anonymous life??)
- Re: storage privacy (was: Nice quiet, private, anonymous life??)
- Re: storage privacy (was: Nice quiet, private, anonymous life??)
- Re: storage privacy (was: Nice quiet, private, anonymous life??)
- Re: storage privacy (was: Nice quiet, private, anonymous life??)
- Re: storage privacy (was: Nice quiet, private, anonymous life??)