[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: heise online: Klarstellung

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: heise online: Klarstellung
From: Olaf Selke <olaf.selke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:32:50 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:32:57 -0500
In-reply-to: <4766449B.7050702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <E1J3c1M-00036O-8S.octo06@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <476450D5.9030602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6ce4a9360712170006k4ba93ba7sa435015adb701426@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4766449B.7050702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

TOR-Admin (gpfTOR1) wrote:
> 
> But first I hope, we do not have to log!!!

although I still believe data retention doesn't apply to tor operators, I would rather shut
down my node than equipping it with lawful interception functionality.

Olaf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: heise online: Klarstellung
  - From: TOR-Admin (gpfTOR1)

References:
- Re: heise online: Klarstellung
  - From: TOR-Admin (gpfTOR1)
- Re: heise online: Klarstellung
  - From: anon ymous
- Re: heise online: Klarstellung
  - From: TOR-Admin (gpfTOR1)

Prev by Author: Re: Tor takes too much RAM
Next by Author: Re: another seeming attack on my server's DirPort
Previous by thread: Re: heise online: Klarstellung
Next by thread: Re: heise online: Klarstellung
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread