[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: heise online: Klarstellung

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: heise online: Klarstellung
From: "TOR-Admin (gpfTOR1)" <tor-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:21:20 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:21:31 -0500
In-reply-to: <47667A82.2060805@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Openpgp: id=BB6AF975
References: <E1J3c1M-00036O-8S.octo06@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <476450D5.9030602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6ce4a9360712170006k4ba93ba7sa435015adb701426@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4766449B.7050702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47667A82.2060805@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)

Olaf Selke schrieb:
> TOR-Admin (gpfTOR1) wrote:
>> But first I hope, we do not have to log!!!
> 
> although I still believe data retention doesn't apply to tor operators, I would rather shut
> down my node than equipping it with lawful interception functionality.

Full ack! But at the moment I do not give up and shut down.

My data retention test was running for arguments, not for real logging.

Half a year ago, Roger D. wrotes here "software moves faster than
law". Lets go for a log-free solution for our nodes. It is not easy,
but I think, I will see you at 24C3?

Karsten N.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: heise online: Klarstellung
  - From: Eugen Leitl

References:
- Re: heise online: Klarstellung
  - From: TOR-Admin (gpfTOR1)
- Re: heise online: Klarstellung
  - From: anon ymous
- Re: heise online: Klarstellung
  - From: TOR-Admin (gpfTOR1)
- Re: heise online: Klarstellung
  - From: Olaf Selke

Prev by Author: Re: heise online: Klarstellung
Next by Author: Re: heise online: Klarstellung
Previous by thread: Re: heise online: Klarstellung
Next by thread: Re: heise online: Klarstellung
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread