[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bittorrent packets

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Bittorrent packets
From: Mitar <mmitar@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:27:19 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:27:23 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=SaWpE5Hcp6M6aoAsqm+lhx0y/wBwSoOjtDq2Bbyc+64=; b=owL9IuNpKqmWy4qXy8qjP/M5NvddWsr2XJqAzh4ElPfE/1gCaDQERsqb4yUEWb9qcr /gUIaLFgc2HvqKkNYt7lyrUOyUnNhSs5tGI/wN/K4H5jvi/MyESNBI83Cv02P+u/1ln0 HCwMvFp88WiSFqGs7bfWI7YsD9GNvK9BpaJ64=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=KN63mnvyMZH3Kj3q0ULO5D9FnV6tzcSrMi5G8rz2duLCERHoee4p0dF1JSNsdIdjdY 9qpNMuDbxOh0xNPTlehi1+LtUk1k5J9zOtCIcc0nUKLUcfpQLT2uMZaGhqrFUrrKQb5U x7bCeOYNv6u9EDcnVNiWmFDrj5VlKQ72KSZaY=
In-reply-to: <3570.134.32.195.139.1229350218.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <f63c4b2d0812141856k43d1c99dva1a465896603166c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4945E62E.9040006@xxxxxxxxx> <4945E811.3050409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1687.134.32.195.139.1229327916.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f63c4b2d0812150535h7589bfa2o5b5a71ebf6a3c7e6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3570.134.32.195.139.1229350218.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi!

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Marco Bonetti
<marco.bonetti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, December 15, 2008 14:35, Mitar wrote:
>> But why port 80? Because that is what the original user has been using
>> and he/she sends this port number to the tracker?
> yes.
> On why the user chooses that specific port... meh... just let your
> imagination go wild: there will be plenty of reasons, from the poor man
> traffic disguise to human stupidity. I've seen computer science engineers
> configuring a firewall on their own laptops and opening port 80 in input
> while saying "because I should be able to surf the web" :D

True. So probably I am getting even more packets to other ports. I am
just not seeing them as they are dropped.


Mitar

References:
- Bittorrent packets
  - From: Mitar
- Re: Bittorrent packets
  - From: Justin Coffi
- Re: Bittorrent packets
  - From: Jon
- Re: Bittorrent packets
  - From: Marco Bonetti
- Re: Bittorrent packets
  - From: Mitar
- Re: Bittorrent packets
  - From: Marco Bonetti

Prev by Author: Re: Bittorrent packets
Next by Author: Failed to hand off onionskin
Previous by thread: Re: Bittorrent packets
Next by thread: Re: Bittorrent packets
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread