[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Request for "Tor, king of anonymity" graphic

On 12/26/13, nano <nanotek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 26/12/2013 8:51 PM, Lee wrote:
>> On 12/25/13, nano <nanotek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 26/12/2013 7:46 AM, Mirimir wrote:
>>>> On 12/25/2013 02:59 AM, nano wrote:
>>>>> On 25/12/2013 8:11 PM, Lunar wrote:
>>>>>> nanotek:
>>>>>>> I really didn't get the "rape" vibe from the graphic at all.
>>>>>> Could you describe what is in the graphic?
>>>>>> Could you try to summarize its intended meaning?
>>>>> Sure. I shared my favoured interpretation earlier.
>>>>> Beyond that, I see Jefferson fucking Obama from behind (i.e. bucking
>>>>> of
>>>>> ignominious attempts to erode our hard-earned constitutional
>>>>> convention). It is very well done too. Picture perfect!
>>>> Isn't it the NSA that's been doing most of the backdoor fucking?
>>> Indeed. The irony only adds to its appeal.
>>>> Tor is rather more like a chastity belt than a crown ;)
>>> Tor empowers citizens to royally fuck Orwellian tactical planning, such
>>> as that which is implemented by the NSA.
>> You should take another look at the docs - eg:
>> https://svn.torproject.org/svn/torvm/trunk/doc/design.html
>>     Indefensible Attacks
>>        Tor Attacks
>>          Attacks which Tor cannot defend against, like a global passive
>> adversary or traffic confirmation attacks, are obviously outside the
>> scope of even the most robust Tor implementation.
>> Regards,
>> Lee
> There is no need. It has been read many times.
> Not sure how your suggestion diminishes Tor's utility in circumventing
> Orwellian policies.

I'm just pointing out that the NSA is a global passive adversary.  My
guess is that Tor's ability to royally fuck Orwellian tactical
planning by the NSA is minimal, but it's possible we have different
definitions of "royally fuck" :)

tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to