It's really two different ways to get the same result. If you wanted
to, you could apply all of FasterFox's settings via about:config. The
only reason I have both is because Firefox has been around much longer
than the Fasterfox extension, and when I wrote the docs originally
manual was the only option. Do other readers find this unclear? If so,
I can easily go back and add a sentence laying out the options
verbatim. Personally, I just use FasterFox with the Optimized or
Turbocharged setting. You can do some playing around with stuff, but
I've found that while Turbo is sometimes a bit faster than Optimized,
it will make some servers be unable to send you content in full or
sometimes even at all, as that setting uses settings outside of the
official RFC specs. That said, I'd try Optimum first to make sure every
thing's working, and then try your luck with Turbo after you've
eliminated any other quirks. Hope this helps, ~Andrew Anothony Georgeo wrote: Hello Andrew, --- ADB <firefox-gen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Its a SOCKS-->HTTP translator of sorts. In other news, I updated the "Firefox Performance with Tor" entry to reference the FasterFox plugin, ~AndrewI have FF 1.5.0.1 configured via. the directions in that Wiki entry, which increased my surfing speed greatly. Then I tried using FasterFox and all my about:config settings(from the Wiki) were removed. Also, it seemed after I used FasterFox my speed *slowed down*. I read the page linked in the Wiki for more FF hacks. I did not apply any further hacks as the ones listed in the Wiki gave me excellent results. I once agagin applied the about:config settings from the Wiki and FF is noticably faster. Is using FasterFox with the fasteset settings preferable to manually configuring about:config according to the Wiki? Cheers __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |